IENYRID M4 Pro S vs HONEY WHALE M4 - Which "Budget Beast" Actually Deserves Your Money?

Fast Answer for Busy Riders ⚡ (TL;DR)

The HONEY WHALE M4 edges out the IENYRID M4 Pro S overall: it feels a touch more coherent as a daily commuter, with a smoother power delivery, slightly more efficient use of its battery and a generally more "sorted" ride in stock form. It is the better pick if you want a straightforward, powerful seated commuter for medium distances and don't plan to tinker much beyond basic bolt checks.

The IENYRID M4 Pro S fights back with a stronger motor, bigger battery options and more range potential, making it more attractive for heavier riders, hillier cities or people who genuinely want to replace some car trips. It suits riders happy to wrench a bit and treat it as a project as much as a vehicle.

Neither scooter is flawless; both demand some mechanical sympathy and realistic expectations. But if you forced me to pick one for most riders, I'd lean HONEY WHALE M4-while quietly admitting that hardcore range hunters may be happier on the IENYRID.

Stick around: the devil is in the details, and these two share more DNA-and more compromises-than their spec sheets like to admit.

Stepping into this comparison feels a bit like déjà vu. Two chunky, mid-priced "M4" scooters, both with seats, both around the same weight, both promising moped-like performance for the cost of a budget smartphone and a weekend away. On paper they are near twins; in real life, the differences show up in how they behave after a week of real commuting, not during the first test ride in a car park.

The IENYRID M4 Pro S comes across as the overachiever of the pair: bigger motor, larger battery options, flashier lights, more suspension, more of everything. It's the scooter for riders who want a spec sheet that looks like it escaped from a much higher price bracket. The HONEY WHALE M4 is more "grown-up commuter": calmer motor, simpler suspension, and a bit more polished in how it puts its power and comfort on the road.

If you're wondering which one will actually make your daily life easier-and not just your group chat more impressed-let's break it down properly.

Who Are These For, and Why Compare Them?

Both scooters live in that sweet-and-scary middle segment: not cheap toys, not true high-end machines, but "budget performance" models promising near-moped pace on a student/commuter budget. You're paying hundreds, not thousands, but you expect to do real kilometres, in real traffic, on real roads that haven't seen proper maintenance since... ever.

The IENYRID M4 Pro S aims at the "value-obsessed enthusiast": someone who wants big power, long range and off-road-capable hardware, and is happy to give the scooter a bit of love with tools and YouTube tutorials. The HONEY WHALE M4 is more obviously aimed at the "serious commuter": daily medium-distance trips on rough urban surfaces, with comfort and sanity taking slight priority over outright bragging rights.

They compete directly because they promise the same thing to the same rider profile: a heavy, fast, seated, dual-suspension 48 V scooter that can actually replace public transport for many people-if you're willing to carry 24 kg of metal in and out of your life.

Design & Build Quality

Pick them up (carefully; your back will complain) and you immediately notice how similar they feel. Both use solid aluminium frames, both feel densely built rather than hollow, and both look like they were designed by people who dislike minimalism as a concept. These aren't sleek city blades; they're compact utility vehicles with ideas above their station.

The IENYRID goes full "industrial sci-fi": exposed springs, bold accent colours, aggressive off-road tyres and a very busy lighting package. It looks like a budget cosplay of a high-end off-road scooter, which some riders love and others quietly wish was just a bit more restrained. The folding mechanism and adjustable bars feel functional enough, but the stem area and clamp do require regular attention; leave it alone and a faint wobble tends to evolve into a worrying one.

The HONEY WHALE M4 plays it a bit straighter: matte black, purposeful, still chunky but more coherent. The welds and joints feel slightly better finished, and the cockpit layout is a bit tidier. The adjustable bars and seat hardware feel solid, and while it's not high-end scooter craftsmanship, it does give more of a "finished product" vibe than the IENYRID, which sometimes feels like a very good kit that the factory just about assembled in time.

In the hand, neither screams premium, but if you're sensitive to creaks, rattles and tiny bits of flex, the HONEY WHALE does a better job of pretending it costs more than it does. The IENYRID feels like the result of "let's throw in everything we can for the price" and polish it later-if at all.

Ride Comfort & Handling

On rough city streets, both are miles ahead of rigid budget scooters. The combination of large pneumatic tyres, front and rear suspension and a seat makes even terrible tarmac feel tolerable. But the way each scooter delivers that comfort is subtly different.

The IENYRID M4 Pro S goes for overkill: dual shocks at the front, a sprung rear and extra damping in the seat post. At first it feels wonderfully cushy-speed bumps turn into soft waves, cobbles become a mild rumble. Push the speed up, though, and the front end can feel a bit loose and underdamped, more "bouncy castle" than precision tool. Hit a series of rolling bumps at high pace and you sometimes end up doing a gentle pogo, especially with the seat installed.

The HONEY WHALE M4, with its simpler dual spring setup, starts out noticeably firmer, particularly for lighter riders. Straight out of the box you feel more of the small chatter in your feet and hands. After a few dozen kilometres, once the springs loosen, it finds a nicer balance: not quite as plush as the IENYRID on the very worst surfaces, but more controlled. It's easier to place the front wheel exactly where you want, which matters when the potholes are doing their best impression of lunar craters.

Deck comfort is comparable: both are wide and long enough to let you shift stance, which saves your knees and ankles on longer rides. Seated, the IENYRID's extra seat damping is a win on broken surfaces, but the HONEY WHALE's slightly more grounded suspension tune makes it feel more stable when carving through traffic or descending a steep hill at speed.

Performance

Twist the throttle and you feel the biggest philosophical difference between the two.

The IENYRID's motor hits harder. Its stronger hub gives it the kind of shove that makes you double-check your helmet strap the first time you fully open it in "Off-Road" mode. Off the line it jumps, and on steeper hills it keeps pushing where lesser scooters die a slow, embarrassing death. For heavier riders or very hilly cities, that extra torque isn't just a nice-to-have; it's the difference between flowing with bikes and cars, and crawling in the gutter.

The downside is refinement. The IENYRID's throttle mapping, while decent for its class, is still on the more abrupt side. It's easy for a new rider to over-twist leaving a junction and feel the front unweight in a way that gets the heart rate up. Braking is strong thanks to dual mechanical discs and electronic assist, but the feel at the levers is a bit wooden until you spend time properly aligning calipers and bedding in pads.

The HONEY WHALE M4's motor is a notch milder on paper, and it feels that way on the road too. Acceleration is still a big step up from entry-level scooters, but the power curve is more progressive. You don't get that same "catapult" sensation, yet you reach brisk commuting speeds quickly and predictably. On medium hills it holds speed impressively; on brutally steep climbs you do start to feel its limits sooner than on the IENYRID.

At higher speeds, the HONEY WHALE feels the more composed of the two. Less violent torque and a slightly calmer chassis make it easier to ride fast without your shoulders tensing up. Braking performance from its dual discs is strong once dialled in, with a confidence that suits daily city chaos. You sacrifice some outright grunt, but you gain manners-which, depending on your commute, may be worth more than raw numbers.

Battery & Range

This is where the IENYRID tries to drop the mic. Even in its "standard" battery form it offers respectable real-world distance; step up to the bigger pack and you're into territory where full-day riding or long suburban-to-city commutes become realistic without a midday charge. Used sensibly-mixing modes, not treating every green light as a drag race-you can stretch a single charge surprisingly far.

The catch: that extra capacity is easy to waste. Ride it everywhere in maximum mode, full throttle, heavy rider, hilly route, and the range drops faster than its marketing copy suggests. The strong motor encourages you to ride harder, and the energy use follows. You can get excellent range, but you do need a tiny bit of discipline.

The HONEY WHALE M4, with its smaller battery, lives a rung below in pure distance. For most commuters doing a there-and-back daily ride, it's broadly enough-especially if your round trip is under a couple of dozen kilometres. Push into longer distances at high speed and you start watching the battery bars with more interest than is healthy.

In terms of efficiency, the HONEY WHALE generally sips rather than gulps: its milder motor and slightly lower peak power mean it does more with each watt-hour, especially if you spend a lot of time in its middle speed mode. Realistically: if your priority is maximum possible range or you want weekend exploration without constant planning, the IENYRID's larger-pack option is the better tool. If you live within a normal commuting envelope and care more about how consistently the scooter behaves across the charge, the HONEY WHALE feels the more predictable companion.

Portability & Practicality

Let's be honest: neither of these is "grab with one hand, hop on a bus, pretend it's nothing." At roughly 24 kg each, they're in the "you can carry it, but you'll remember doing it" category.

The IENYRID's folding system is quick enough and the collapsible bars do help with trunk fit or tucking it under a desk. But the overall package remains bulky. Lugging it up several flights of stairs is technically doable and practically miserable. The busy design and protruding components also mean you have to think a little about how you store it so you're not constantly bumping the lights or scratching walls.

The HONEY WHALE folds into a slimmer, more orderly package. It's still heavy, but it's a bit easier to manoeuvre through doors or into a car thanks to a tidier silhouette. The lack of extra visual clutter actually becomes a practical advantage when you're wrestling it into a cramped hallway.

As everyday tools, both scooters are far better suited to ground-floor living, garages, lifts and car boots than walk-up flats. If your routine involves multiple staircases or crowded trains, you're trying to make these scooters do something they fundamentally aren't designed for. Between the two, the HONEY WHALE wins portability by being less awkward rather than less heavy; a small victory, but noticeable in a week of real use.

Safety

On the safety front, both bring serious hardware for the money: big tyres, dual mechanical discs, plenty of lighting, and frames that don't feel like they'll fold in half if you sneeze.

The IENYRID adds electronic braking assistance and a very loud, very bright presence on the road. Its lighting system really is overkill in a good way: headlight that actually throws useful light, side strips, indicators, rear light-all combining to make you look more like a rolling Christmas tree than a stealth scooter. Drivers see you, which is the whole point. The downside is that everything depends on you keeping bolts tight; a developing stem wobble plus strong brakes plus high speed is not a trio you want to experience together.

The HONEY WHALE's approach is a bit more sober. Its lighting is still good-front light, bright reactive rear, side LEDs-but less theatrical. Braking is all mechanical, no fancy electronic assistance, but well-tuned. In practice, it feels very trustworthy, especially once you've done the initial adjustment that virtually all budget disc setups need. The slightly calmer power delivery also lowers the chance of ham-fisted throttle causing drama.

In poor conditions-wet roads, dusty corners-weirdly, the less powerful HONEY WHALE often feels safer at the limit simply because it's easier to ride within its envelope. The IENYRID can be perfectly safe too, but it demands more respect, more maintenance and a bit more rider judgement. If that sounds like work, take note.

Community Feedback

Price & Value

Price-wise they sit close enough that, in real life, discounts and local availability will often decide which one you actually buy. The IENYRID usually comes in a bit cheaper in its base configuration, then climbs if you opt for the bigger battery. The HONEY WHALE tends to hover slightly higher but stays simpler: one main spec, fewer variants.

In raw euros-per-spec terms, the IENYRID looks like the runaway winner. More watts, more watt-hours, more suspension, more lights, more everything for slightly less money. If you judge scooters purely on paper, it's hard to argue against it.

But value isn't just "how much stuff can we bolt on." The HONEY WHALE's value comes from being ready to live with as a commuter with slightly less fiddling. It wastes less of its battery on unnecessary drama, it feels more predictable, and it doesn't constantly tempt you to ride like you're late to a track day. For the average rider with a normal commute, that calm, dependable competence is worth a lot.

Service & Parts Availability

Neither of these brands has the slick service ecosystem of a big-name European or US manufacturer. You're mostly dealing with online sellers, third-party shops and a lot of community knowledge. Think "mechanically inclined e-bike owner" rather than "press button, technician appears."

The IENYRID benefits from being a very widely sold platform. That means spare parts-controllers, throttles, brake bits, even full wheels-are relatively easy to source from multiple vendors. It also means plenty of tutorials, hack guides and troubleshooting threads. On the flip side, official support can be slow, and you're expected to fit most replacement parts yourself.

The HONEY WHALE M4 is a bit more regionally patchy. In some markets it's everywhere; in others, you'll be relying heavily on generic parts and your local scooter/bike workshop to improvise. The upside is that it uses quite standard components, so many issues can be fixed with generic 48 V scooter parts. The downside is less consistent warranty handling and fewer region-specific service centres.

In Europe especially, I'd call serviceability a very gentle win for the IENYRID simply because of sheer platform popularity, while noting that neither is a poster child for premium after-sales care.

Pros & Cons Summary

Parameters Comparison

Final Verdict - Which Should You Choose?

Both of these scooters sit in that slightly awkward but very popular corner of the market where you're asking for a lot-speed, comfort, range, and a low price-and the engineering team is doing its best while the bean counters hover behind them. They're both impressive for the money, and both make compromises you'll notice once the honeymoon period is over.

If your riding is genuinely demanding-longer distances, bigger hills, heavier rider, maybe some light off-road-and you're comfortable taking a toolkit to your scooter now and then, the IENYRID M4 Pro S is the more capable platform. The punchier motor and higher-capacity battery options simply open doors the HONEY WHALE can't. Treat it like a project as much as a vehicle, keep on top of bolts and setup, and it will reward you with serious performance per euro.

If, however, your riding is more classic urban commuting-moderate hills, medium distances, lots of stop-start traffic-and you want something that feels a bit calmer, more cohesive and less needy, the HONEY WHALE M4 makes more sense. It trades some headline power and extreme range for a more predictable, less dramatic daily life. You still get speed that feels properly quick, real suspension, a seat and serious brakes, but in a package that behaves more like a sensible commuter and less like a budget hot rod.

For most riders who just want to get to work and back with a grin rather than a toolkit in their backpack, I'd lean toward the HONEY WHALE M4. For those who see their scooter as half transport, half hobby-and don't mind occasionally chasing a rattle or tweaking settings-the IENYRID M4 Pro S remains a very tempting, if slightly rough-around-the-edges, beast.

Numbers Freaks Corner

These metrics are purely mathematical. Price-per-Wh and price-per-km show how much you pay for stored energy and practical distance. Weight-based metrics indicate how much mass you're hauling around for each unit of performance or range. Wh-per-km is a simple efficiency indicator: how much energy the scooter burns per kilometre. Power-to-speed and weight-to-power describe how muscular the scooter is for its size, while average charging speed tells you how quickly the battery refills relative to its capacity. None of this says which scooter feels nicer-only how the raw numbers stack up.

Author's Category Battle

Overall Winner Declaration

In the Numbers Freaks Corner, the IENYRID M4 Pro S scores 10 points against the HONEY WHALE M4's 1. In the Author's Category Battle, the IENYRID M4 Pro S gets 25 ✅ versus 14 ✅ for HONEY WHALE M4.

Totals: IENYRID M4 Pro S scores 35, HONEY WHALE M4 scores 15.

Based on the scoring, the IENYRID M4 Pro S is our overall winner. Living with both, the HONEY WHALE M4 is the one I'd hand to most riders and feel confident they'll still be happy with it months later: it rides calmer, feels more cohesive and asks for less attention while still being properly quick and comfortable. The IENYRID M4 Pro S is undeniably the better deal on paper and a lot of fun when it's dialled in, but it behaves more like a budget performance project than a quietly competent commuter. If your heart wants maximum power and range and your hands don't mind getting slightly dirty, the IENYRID will make you smile wider. If your priority is arriving on time, in one piece, with the scooter feeling like a partner rather than a part-time job, the HONEY WHALE is the one that ultimately makes more real-world sense.

That's our verdict when we try to stay objective – but hey, riding is mostly about emotions anyway, so pick the one that will make you look forward to your commute every single day.